Anna Recasens

October 2025-April 2026 Creative In the Wilderness


 

“...at that moment, all spaces change, all heights, distances; the city is transfigured, becoming crystalline, transparent as a dragonfly.”  Italo Calvino, Invisible Cities

Since 2005 I have been investigating the use of public space for intimate purposes, differentiating various uses for love and sexual practices. With this, I refer to appropriations in which urban space is used or temporarily modified to announce, accommodate, shelter or hide intimate interactions and experiences regarding life and death.

Desde 2005 investigo el uso del espacio público con fines íntimos diferenciando diversos usos relacionados con el amor y las prácticas sexuales. Me refiero a apropiaciones del espacio urbano en las que éste es utilizado o modificado temporalmente para anunciar, alojar, cobijar u ocultar interacciones y experiencias íntimas relacionadas con la vida y la muerte.

ARQUITECTURA SENSIBLE/LOVE WALLS is an ongoing investigation which invites viewers to recognise the process of communication which begins with love messages found on the streets, establishing a relationship with passing readers. These messages act as an element involved in the construction of the social space looking to bring about a more humane city. I have collected hundreds of love messages found in the streets, as well as other affective expressions of love, disappointment, thanks, mourning, among others. These are elements shaping subtle landscapes of love and death which are understood by a community, or universally creating a layer of urban loveability that surfaces no matter what, and which persists in time.

ARQUITECTURA SENSIBLE/LOVE WALLS es una investigación en curso que invita a los espectadores a reconocer el proceso de comunicación que se inicia con mensajes de amor encontrados en la calle, estableciendo una relación con los lectores que pasan por allí. Estos mensajes actúan como un elemento que participa en la construcción del espacio social para una ciudad más humana. He recopilado cientos de mensajes de amor encontrados en las calles, así como otras expresiones afectivas de amor, decepción, agradecimiento, duelo, entre otros. Estos elementos conforman paisajes de amor y muerte que son entendidos por una comunidad, o universalmente, creando una capa de amorabilidad urbana que aflora sin importar nada y que persiste en el tiempo.

All images in gallery above courtesy of Anna Recasens

Anna Recasens / Related links: Website / Instagram / Instagram Mira por Donde / On Art and Friendship

Anna Recasens is a visual artist, researcher and cultural manager who combines her personal and collective artistic proposals with research and cultural revitalization intiatives. Her projects center around art, nature, urban issues, and social space. She also teaches workshops, publishes articles, and participates in forums related to these subjects. Recasens’ individual and collaborative work has been presented internationally in residencies and exhibitions. Between 2012 and 2017, she founded and directed the Laboratori Social Metropolità, based in the NauEstruch, Sabadell, Catalonia. Recasens is part of and collaborates with art programs and platforms such as Idensitat and Plataforma Vértices. www.annarecasens.org


OCTOBER: Considering the existing urban fabric and its current fast changing development, there is a need to reclaim meeting points in order to provoke responses, to leave a trace of a human presence—and to return more personal traces to the cityscape.

Old meeting points related to the geography or history of cities have been replaced by more commercial landmarks. There have always been places within the metropolis that provide adequate space for interactions and intimacy, such as parks and lovers lanes, now lost within a generic urban design that rejects such concepts of privacy. This pushes users of such spaces to reinvent sites for this purpose; appropriating certain city spots to provide temporary accommodation, shelter, and/or comfort for these meetings.

The definition of city-space, is set for some approved public uses: zones for commerce and work, for leisure and consumerist activities, etc. In the “dissident city,” public space is turned inside out, and the urban landscape itself is redefined, reprogrammed, "hacked" by users, in order to reclaim contact in microclimates, where certain "zones" where private activity is accepted exist side by side with trade zones, playgrounds, resting areas, or become extensions of the private space so as to expand socialization in everyday life.

Image courtesy of Anna Recasens

Around 1998, while living in Glasgow, I took an interest in finding traces of aspects of private life in the streets: desire paths, meeting points, or even car boot sales, hence discovering a whole world of activity in the back lanes. This activity hid from what happened in the main streets. Later on in my life, motherhood pointed me in a completely new transient urban path that of playgrounds, child friendly zones and shelters—to be safe from possible weather changes. At that point, I was wandering around, registering my transientness and leaving short messages (Nomad’s Dictionary), which I printed in various sizes. These messages were light and portable, and I placed them in specific places during my walks.

In 2004, back in my hometown of Sabadell, Catalonia, I continued documenting my transientness, noting differences due to the local weather conditions and the configuration of this city. But what seduced me were the similarities between Glasgow and Sabadell, as the need to appropriate urban space was a commonality these two cities shared. This also showed the similar  degree of resilience in these two cities. At that point, while I started to work on an investigation regarding private attitudes in public space, specially focused on sex-related activities (Urban Intimacy, 2005-2008), I also started to process my previous documentations of everyday private situations in public space; the occupations of such locations, and the ephemeral structures built in them. I continued adding new materials to this research and staging public interventions using words, drawings, and even shared ephemeral actions. For example, Zoographies project, 2006, developed during a residency in Mooste, Estonia, allowed me to do these exploratory investigations within a small community.

During 2007-08, by means of walks and interviews, I mapped places where people shared their first kisses in Sabadell, Catalonia. In 2008, after ending my Urban Intimacy project, which was part of the exhibition Post-It City (Barcelona, 2008), and after finishing my map of first kisses, I gathered various collections of images, stories, and testimonies, which I named Arquitectura Sensible. This was an umbrella project covering situations closely related to ephemeral appropriations of urban spaces by citizens, both for private, even very intimate purposes, and for community activities. However, the highlight of these situations was the use of the walls and urban furniture as canvases for communication, bearing messages about politics, complaints, general issues, but specially about love. So, I have continued my research with the Love Walls collection, hence looking at the communication of affection in public sites, as well as to how this humanizes urban spots in spite of their fierce current commercialization.

Image courtesy of Anna Recasens


November: “They become liberated spaces that can be occupied. A rich indetermination gives them, by means of a semantic rarefaction, the function of articulating a second, poetic geography on top of the geography of the literal, forbidden or permitted meaning. They insinuate other routes into the functionalist and historical order of movement. Walking follows them: I fill this great empty space with a beautiful name.” Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life

SENSING THE CITY: I go out to explore the city, any city. Alone or accompanied. I draw maps of experiences referring to personal milestones, those of others. This includes emotional contours of the community and its immediate environment. I look for traces, patterns, signs of behavior, identities. I observe changes, layers, evolutions. Wandering in space and time.

WANDERING/WANDERLUST I walk slowly, following the rhythm set by my searches and encounters. I think. I wonder. Is there a river nearby? It seems so. If I take the longer path, I lose myself in the green damp memory of the urban forest, or in the old stone on which I can run my fingers across rediscovering myself in the memory of touch. Getting to know the place by touching the city’s skin means also reading the calligraphies of desire which hide in its wrinkles. Which will be the next message, the next story? I collect images, textures, and texts, so as not to forget.

LOVE STORIES: Love messages shape an imaginary space where the details of everyday life can be valuable to store, to map, to keep, as a reminder and as a way of recovering experiences and time lost. As we exist in continuous transformation, urban space becomes a significant structure which we build in common, thus to mark memory. Walls in streets, stations, parks, etc., are in an ongoing state of flux, changed by their users and their users’ needs. Narratives pertaining the individual as well as the collective are inscribed and layered by the constant use. The urban context then evolves and undergoes redefinition, along with the community and its activities. Although these spaces may appear fragmented and discontinuous, new messages of love or political demands, and also those related to mourning or hope are written again and again, far from official narrative. These messages create routes to be understood within the community where they are written to be experienced across generations.


December: COMMUNICATION

In a broad sense, love is a symbolic space, a social construct. In this space, humans learn to navigate the various contexts in which they become carriers or receivers of love. The idea of love is never the same. In many ways it has to do with the ideas of caring for, or caring with, and also with the idea of being connected. Therefore, we project various kinds of love in the form of friendship, motherhood, kindness, or even charity. While it is possible to argue whether love is a social construct—or whether it may be rooted in our biology or psyche—or whether it may even be a uniquely human feature that helps us to connect with other beings through love(s)—it remains a basic fact that love is actually a process of communication. Or to be precise, a succession of communicative actions…but also a way of engaging with others. These processes of communication depend upon cultures or societies.

Some of the messages found in the streets, include those shaping a story which unfolds through time, those which describe wishes, those which attempt to attract the attention of the object of love, those which express the loss of love, and those which express joy. These messages are in fact communications which we, the viewers, are never certain have reached the objective. Are these messages of personal fulfilment? Do they express a need to communicate in public? Are they a way to interact? We are living in “liquid times” (Baumann), and surely love is experiencing big changes, becoming in the best of cases a deep commitment, life-time companionship, passion, or even a sense of community; and in the worst of cases, a utopia defined by years of romantic storytelling which ends justifying a profound selfishness and lack of real connection.